Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-02-13 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-02-13 Senate Journal Page 2405 SCR 23 SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 23 Relating to long range financial planning, which had been held to the February 13 calendar (page 2386) was read the second time. 1996-02-13 Senate Journal Page 2406 SCR 23 Senator Sharp moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the State Affairs Committee Substitute offered on page 2345. Senator Duncan objected. Senator Pearce called the Senate. The question being: Shall the State Affairs Committee Substitute for SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 23 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCR 23 Second Reading Adopt STA Committee Substitute? YEAS: 12 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff and so, CS FOR SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 23(STA) was adopted, read the second time and was before the Senate on final passage. Senator Salo offered Amendment No. 1 : Delete: Page 2, lines 22-25 Insert: FURTHER RESOLVED that the Nineteenth Alaska State Legislature in closing the fiscal gap and developing a long range plan shall prioritize expenditures by taking into account our constitutional responsibilities and the needs of our children, the elderly, and our needy citizens; and be it Senator Salo moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Objections were heard. Senator Halford moved to divide the amendment into two parts, Part 1 being: Delete: Page 2, lines 22-25 1996-02-13 Senate Journal Page 2407 SCR 23 Part 2 being: Insert: FURTHER RESOLVED that the nineteenth Alaska State Legislature in closing the fiscal gap and developing a long range plan shall prioritize expenditures by taking into account our constitutional responsibilities and the needs of our children, the elderly, and our needy citizens; and be it The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be divided? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSCR 23(STA) Divide the Question YEAS: 12 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 1 was divided. The question being: Shall Part 1 of Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSCR 23(STA) Amendment No. 1 Part 1 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson and so, Part 1 of Amendment No. 1 failed. The question being: Shall Part 2 of Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-02-13 Senate Journal Page 2408 SCR 23 CSSCR 23(STA) Amendment No. 1 Part 2 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Pearce, R.Phillips, Salo, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Miller, Rieger, Sharp and so, Part 2 of Amendment No. 1 was adopted. The question being: Shall CS FOR SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 23(STA) am Relating to long range financial planning, pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSCR 23(STA) am Second Reading - Final Passage YEAS: 12 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff and so, CS FOR SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 23(STA) am passed the Senate. Senator Duncan gave notice of reconsideration.